Legal source verification for AI text

VeriLeges checks whether ECLIs, statute articles, and citations actually exist.AI sometimes fabricates legal sources. You see which ones right away.

Start free - 5 source checks per monthNo credit card · Sign in with email code · No AI judgment of the content
Aligned with Netherlands Bar Association guidance on responsible AI useSources checked against: wetten.overheid.nl · rechtspraak.nl · EUR-Lex · HUDOC

Screenshot from the live app - source check catches a fabricated ECLI among valid citations.
See a sample check

Immediate result

In one check you immediately see

Source found or not found
Quick visibility into whether the citation can be checked.
Warnings for unclear citations
Signals where extra review is needed.
Direct source links
Jump straight to the linked source.
Report with review prioritization
See faster where manual review still matters.
Problem

The problem is familiar

AI text can sound legally strong while citations may not exist, may be incomplete, or may lack enough context. That costs review time and raises the risk of errors in memos, thesis drafts, and draft advice.

Research and EU AI Act

Why this check keeps getting more important

Research shows the risk of incorrect or fabricated legal citations in AI text can be substantial. Attention for responsible and accountable AI use is also growing, including under the EU AI Act.

Read more about research and AI regulation

Solution

VeriLeges provides a fast first verification layer

VeriLeges (a product of Softron B.V.) detects legal citations, checks them within the current verification scope against linked authoritative sources, and shows clear signals with source links. The check follows fixed rules, is reproducible, and works without a generative AI model.

  • Does the cited judgment or statute article actually exist?
  • Is the citation complete and specific enough?
  • Is there a signal that the cited judgment was later (partly) quashed?
  • Are there signals of incorrect or overly assertive source use?
  • Where is additional human legal review needed?
Netherlands Bar Association guidance

Bar recommendations you can apply directly

The Netherlands Bar Association emphasizes competence, confidentiality, and human final responsibility. VeriLeges supports you with demonstrable citation checks in your review flow.

Read the summary of the Netherlands Bar Association recommendations

How it works

How VeriLeges works

1

Add your text

Paste a memo, thesis draft, draft advice, or other legal text you want to check.

2

VeriLeges detects citations

The tool detects ECLIs, statute articles, and other legal citations.

3

You get a verification report

With signals, warnings, and source links to prioritize your review.

Audiences

Who is VeriLeges for?

🎓

Law students

Avoid leaving AI-fabricated sources in theses, papers, or notes.

Start free

For students →

Lawyers and legal professionals

Use VeriLeges as a first verification layer for memos, draft advice, and AI-generated file text.

View pricing

For lawyers →

👥

Teams and organizations

Make AI legal text checks part of responsible AI use across your team or organization.

Schedule demo

For organizations →

No legal judgment

VeriLeges does not replace legal assessment

VeriLeges is a verification layer for source citations and verification signals. A positive outcome does not mean a text is legally correct, complete, or approved. Human legal assessment remains necessary.

FAQ on verification without a generative AI model

Frequently asked questions

Why is verification without a generative AI model more reliable?
VeriLeges uses fixed rules, without a generative AI model. Outcomes are reproducible within the current verification scope and do not depend on generative variation.
How does VeriLeges prevent AI hallucinations?
VeriLeges does not prevent hallucinations at the source. It makes them visible by checking citations from AI text against linked authoritative sources and showing clear verification signals.
Does a positive outcome mean the text is legally correct?
No. A positive outcome means no hard or soft signals were found within the current verification scope. Substantive legal assessment by a lawyer remains necessary.

Ready to review AI legal text with more confidence?

Use VeriLeges as a first filter within the current verification scope, with clear signals and source links.